Without something, there wouldn’t even be nothing!

                    Imperfection is the most fundamental law of nature.
                 It can be demonstrated empirically at any time,
                 in any place, and as often as one wishes.

Why is there not nothing?

Why is there actually something and not simply nothing? This question is the oldest and most fundamental question that has ever existed. To answer it, one must begin at the very beginning. The very beginning is the point at which the question “What came before?” no longer arises. “ABSOLUTE NOTHINGNESS” is the only concept for which the question “What came before?” no longer arises.
.
Absolutely nothing has never existed, because if there had ever been absolutely nothing, it would have always stayed that way. Because in absolute nothingness there would of course have been no possibility that this state would ever change, because even the slightest possibility would have been more than absolutely nothing. SOMETHING has therefore always been there, because if this SOMETHING had come into being, there would have been absolutely (without exception) nothing before its creation and it would have always stayed that way.

. But why was there not absolutely nothing and why did it not remain so?
Well, where would absolute nothingness have been? Absolute nothingness (the total absence of anything whatsoever) allows for no dimension in which it could have existed, or relative to which everything could have been absent — because a dimension would already be more than nothing. And when would absolute nothingness have been? Absolute nothingness allows for no time in which it could have existed, or relative to which everything could have been absent — because time would also already be more than nothing. Absolute nothingness could not even have existed theoretically, because a theory would also already be more than nothing. The state of “absolute nothingness” (a total absence of all being) therefore could never have existed. Even an absence would already be more than nothing, because an absence requires something relative to which it can be absent.

What could have been absent relative to what — and when and where?
It’s a vicious circle.

Something has always existed. For only something that exists (1) creates even the possibility for absence (0) to be absent relative to something. Roughly comparable to numbers in mathematics: If numbers did not exist, zeros would not exist either. Without the number one, there would not even be zero. Without something, there would not even be nothing.
.

Page 1 von 10

Imperfection

The imperfection (the flawedness): A SOMETHING causes a flaw in NOTHING and thus produces the foundation of the core principle: imperfection (faulty). SOMETHING cannot escape the principle it has caused, and thus it is also imperfect (flawed). NOTHING contains SOMETHING as an exception, and SOMETHING contains NOTHING as an exception. Whatever develops, forms, or shapes itself from this fundamentally flawed SOMETHING + NOTHING will remain flawed, for in the smallest common denominator both already create a flaw in the other. This is symbolized roughly in the Yin-Yang symbol. Even though the Yin-Yang symbol says nothing about faulty and is therefore worthless in this specific regard, it still helps to illustrate the basic structure. A much better symbolic comparison is the principle of LEGO bricks — the studs. The stud is (symbolically) the flaw in the LEGO brick. Without this flaw, LEGO would not be LEGO. Whatever you build with LEGO contains studs. You can build in a way that hides the studs, but they are still there. Imperfection is therefore the fundamental principle of all that exists. So it is, so it has always been, and so it will always remain. From the smallest to the largest, everything is and remains flawed.

By flawed, we don’t mean wrong or defective but rather an exception to the rule,
an irregularity within regularity, an asymmetry within symmetry, a deviation from the conventional,
a fluctuation in vibration, an uncertainty within that which is certain,
an inaccuracy or fuzziness, something that is missing within the fullness,
or succinctly put: an imperfection in perfection.
Even Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle could be a consequence of imperfection!

Imperfection is the fundamental principle of all that exists!

Something and nothing

   SOMETHING = a single, purposeless, meaning-free, real existent.
This SOMETHING has always existed, for in timelessness the moment is simultaneously eternity. This SOMETHING is the totality of all that exists. It causes a “flaw” in NOTHING and thereby makes the existence of NOTHING possible, because through a SOMETHING, NOTHING gains the possibility of being nothing relative to something. NOTHING exists only together with SOMETHING. Without something, there would not even be nothing.
.
   NOTHING = any number of theoretical possibilities.
Only one of the countless theoretical possibilities exists in reality: namely a SOMETHING. If this SOMETHING did not exist, no further possibility could ever be realized, for only a real possibility can also realize theoretical possibilities. Roughly comparable to the many possibilities in a soccer game: without a SOMETHING (a ball), even theoretically there would be no possibilities for playing soccer. Without a ball, there would not even be soccer — just as without something, there would not even be nothing. - If I were alone in NOTHING, I could stretch my hand into the NOTHING, because NOTHING gives me the possibility to do so. This means: NOTHING = theoretical possibilities.

  SOMETHING + NOTHING, are therefore the smallest common denominator. Smaller would be less than nothing. Therefore, the smallest common denominator contains everything at the same time. And this is exactly what we observe: in both the micro- and the macrocosm we observe a mixture of SOMETHING and NOTHING. This cannot be otherwise, for SOMETHING without NOTHING would be infinitely large and dense with no possibility for this state to ever change. And NOTHING without SOMETHING would not even be nothing. — But neither is perfect!

Page 2 of 10

Absolute nothingness (the complete absence of anything whatsoever) cannot exist, for what should be absent relative to what — and when, and where? Absolute nothingness is not something that can be, because the ability to be would already be more than nothing! But even not being able to be would already be more than nothing, because not-being-able-to-be requires something relative to which it cannot be. Here the snake bites its own tail.

A SOMETHING has always been there and causes a flaw in NOTHING. Only a flaw makes the existence of NOTHING possible. For only the presence of a SOMETHING enables NOTHING to be absent relative to something.

Imperfection (flawedness)
as the most fundamental principle.

SOMETHING cannot escape the very principle it has caused in the first place, and is therefore also imperfect (flawed).
The NOTHING causes a flaw in SOMETHING.

    The duality: NOTHING and SOMETHING can exist only together.
    SOMETHING can only exist together with NOTHING, for otherwise
    SOMETHING would be infinitely large and infinitely dense.
    NOTHING can only exist together with SOMETHING,
    for without something there would not even be nothing.

Everything carries its opposite within itself:

The NOTHING with a SOMETHING as an exception (flawed)
The SOMETHING with a NOTHING as an exception (flawed)

The fundamental principle — imperfection — moves in circles.
Chance (randomness) draws its flaws sometimes from above, then again from
below, sometimes from behind, then from in front, sometimes from the right,
then from the left. Sometimes from the inside, sometimes from the outside. Sometimes directly, sometimes indirectly. Sometimes visibly, then again invisibly.

Chance collects its shortcomings in undulations (randomly).
Sometimes more, then less, sometimes earlier, then again later.
Sometimes trivial, other times fundamental shortcomings.
You can observe this everywhere in everyday life.
     On large scales, chance roughly balances itself out. After millions
of rounds of the lottery, all numbers have come up approximately
the same number of times.
            Approximate symmetry is a property on very large scales.

Imperfection (flawedness) is the foundation of all that is.
.
The accumulation of flaws (exceptions) brought forth diversity,
for no flaw resembles another.

* By flaw is not meant “wrong” or “defective,” but rather an exception to the rule.

Nothing is more disastrous for one’s path in life
than correcting the flaws that came into being by chance

Page 3 of 10

I am the omnipotence:
Imperfection

Nothing can bend me, not even I myself!

Imperfection (faulty) is the most fundamental of all laws of nature.
It can be empirically demonstrated at any time, in any place, and as often as one wishes. No observation shows the opposite. Or does anyone know anything absolute? Imperfection stands above all laws of nature and thus also above our lives. Its omnipotence forces us, again and again in our daily lives, into disorder through randomly caused flaws. This means: the more we organize our lives, the more disorder pushes into the order so that the order remains imperfect. Nothing can stop this — no remedy exists.

The tragedy of perfectionism

Simplified symbolism: YYou dig a hole in a snowfield, and with the snow you build a snowman. The snowman is delighted to stand in a flawless snowfield. But then he sees the hole. To create a perfect world for himself, he begins to repair the hole. Since the snowman himself is the material he needs to fix the flaw in the snowfield, he begins to destroy himself.

The drive for perfection brought suffering into his world!

Cause and effect

The subsequent course is then only a symptom
.
.

Before the snowman destroys himself, he will — in order to preserve his kind — dig several holes and build little snowmen. When these grow up, they too are pleased to stand in a perfect snowfield, but then they see their holes. To create a perfect world for themselves, they begin to repair the holes. Since the snowmen themselves are the material they need to fix the damage in the snowfield, they begin to destroy themselves.
— Not all snowmen will destroy themselves. Some will attack other snowmen in order to obtain the snow they need to improve their own world. These will organize, defend themselves, arm themselves, and ultimately go to war. Many snowmen will die as a result, and they will found religions and sanctify the war to justify the fallen in the name of a god. - And this sequence of events transforms the entire snowfield into chaos (with one exception). And all of this happens only because the first snowman wanted the snowfield to be the way it would be if he were not there, and as a result, constant improvement became the purpose of life.

He could shape the entire snowfield. But he also wanted it to be perfect!
.

This goes on until the first snowman realizes that nothing can be flawless. The decrease of order in the snowfield stands in contrast to the increase of order in the snowman’s consciousness. The more chaos increases in the snowfield, the more the snowman becomes aware that he cannot fix the original flaw.

Page 4 of 10

This pattern runs through all areas of our lives like a red thread. The story of the snowman is a universal symbol and can be applied to anything: politics, economics, science, education, finance, legislation, technology, healthcare systems, medicine, sports, food, administration, bureaucracy, parenting, media, tradition, religion, and even evolution. If evolution exceeds its boundaries, nature restores its natural order. When one applies this story to oneself, one understands one’s own imperfection.

The tragedy of perfectionism: Health

Once upon a time, there were two people. LLet’s simply call them — just for fun — “Adam and Eve.”They were healthy, except for one exception: once a month (an arbitrarily assumed interval) they would get a small pimple on their face (a symbolic illness), which disappeared on its own again. One day they thought:It is not g ood that our health makes an exception once a month and gives us a sickness. We will build a perfect health for ourselves. And they successfully used a healing herb against the pimple — with the result that the next generation got two pimples a month:the system-caused pimple + the inherited pimple from the previous generation. The total remains constant, only shifted in time! The next generation then used even more healing herbs, and so on. This “original sin” multiplied over time into today’s multitude of ailments and diseases along with all their countermeasures. This process continues in wave-like movements until one stops treating the small, trivial illnesses. Then the process reverses — slowly, but inevitably.Because of its ineffectiveness, homeopathy is therefore the best medicine for small, trivial illnesses (the exceptions). It leaves health imperf ect.

Imperfection is always at least one exception ahead of us. It's comparable to tolerance in manufacturing. Tolerance defines the size of the error that is tolerated. Chance then determines the size of the error that makes the workpiece imperfect in its dimensions. Anyone who believes they can manufacture a perfect workpiece should try it sometime. Perfect dimensions remain unattainable.

Because only in theory is 1 x 1 = 1 In reality,

You can observe and measure this at any time, anywhere, as often as you want.

And illnesses arise in exactly the same way: through ignoring the most fundamental of all laws of nature — imperfection.It is the constant treatment of the small, trivial, recurring illnesses — the exceptions, the flaws#
in health — that multiplies exceptions along with their countermeasures exponentially. This is why wild animals, without doctors, hospitals, or the pharmaceutical industry, are overall far healthier than we humans. This can be observed everywhere. Exceptions confirm the rule.

Disability: People with disabilities are the exceptions to the uninjured — both physically and mentally. Exceptions are the foundation of everything that exists. If there were no disabled individuals, there would also be no uninjured ones. Honor those who are disabled — their disability carries our intactness.

Same-sex: The love between man and woman is the rule; the love between man and man (or woman and woman) is the exception. Exceptions are the foundation of everything that exists. Without love between same-sex individuals, there would be no love between opposite-sex individuals

Page 5 of 10

The Meaning of Life

We are here — that cannot be denied. But why are we here at all?
.
.

We are here, that cannot be denied. Yes, but why are we here anyway?
We (this SOMETHING) are the exception (the flaw) within Nothingness.
We are here because it is not possible not to be here — for if we were not here, there would not even be nothing.

.
But why do we live?
Life is the exception (the flaw)

in the lifeless. The meaning of life is to live. Because without life there is no lifelessness, without lifelessness there is no something and without something there would not even be nothing. However, to bridge eternity, everyone should give deep meaning to each life because eternity then lasts a bit longer after all. So bad luck. Because recurring chance encounters with oneself bring every injustice back into balance. Approximate symmetry is a property on very large scales. And suddenly the lost truth from days long past knocks at the door. Somehow, somewhere, sometime.
.
    And where do we come from?
We have always been here, for without us there would not even have been nothing.
.
   And what are we doing here?
We do nothing more than exist, because without us there would not even be nothing.
.
   And where do we go afterwards?
We remain here forever, for if we were no longer here, there would not even be nothing anymore. About 3.5 billion years ago, life united with the lifeless to form the first cell (chance). 1.5 billion years later, evolution brought death into life. Dying is not a part of life but a primitive phenomenon of evolution in which matter separates from the information of our life. And this information cannot be irretrievably lost — where would it go? Information cannot dissolve into absolute nothingness, because absolute nothingness does not exist (see page 1); there is only relative nothingness (nothing relative to something), and that means possibilities (see page 2). — Dead and resting in peace as a timeless piece of information, a possibility waiting for a new chance event.

.
   But who are we (this something in nothing) really?
This question remains unanswered. And self-knowledge will forever remain imperfect.

  Imperfection is tthe fundamental principle of all that exists. The totality as an exception to this rule. Only as a “greater whole” is all being absolute. If the details were not flawed, the totality could not be perfect. This is what the principle requires: the more holistically one perfects, the more primitive the flaws that randomness introduces into the details so that the whole can remain perfect. Only through our imperfection in detail are we perfect. Therefore causality is also imperfect. Something, lacking a point of reference, is both there and not there. It fluctuates (pulses) perfectly — except for exceptions (flaws). Thus, causes are never followed by absolute effects. And the same applies to what is called the “Big Bang.” The Big Bang was random, because randomness consists of exceptions to causality. A fluctuation fell out of rhythm by chance (a flaw). The SOMETHING was already back again, although it had not fully disappeared yet. Something encountered itself, just as the sperm cell encounters the egg cell so that life may arise. The same principle as in fertilization. But even randomness is not flawless. The imperfection of randomness allows life to have free will. Free will is, from the perspective of causality, consciously induced chance — and thus flawed chance. The less we correct what chance brings us, the freer our lives become. For only by not correcting chance do we bring freedom into our lives.

The more we live with chance, the freer our lives become.

Page 6 of 10

The Principle of Chance

SOMETHING is placed within NOTHING by chance. Nothing is more relevant to our daily lives than this circumstance. Here is a story that contains errors, which will also be pointed out. We will ignore these errors for the sake of clarity and expressiveness.

A farmer owns an infinitely large piece of farmland. Every square meter of his infinitely large field is identical to every other square meter. Thus he has infinitely many theoretical, equally valid possibilities, which he can use according to his own capabilities — depending on how much equipment he has available for his farm. The farmer wants to plant a seed. The farmer stands before his infinitely many theoretical possibilities. This is, of course, incorrect — for if his theoretical possibilities are infinite, then he is already within those possibilities. But we will ignore that. Where should he plant his seed? Lacking any criteria for decision-making (every square meter is identical), he lets chance decide. That is also incorrect, because there is no such thing as “chance itself,” but only randomness. Yet we ignore this as well, because in everyday language one simply calls randomness “chance.” At the spot chosen by chance (by randomness), he plants his seed. Could it be that, in retrospect, chance acted unwisely? Could it be that it would have been better if chance had chosen another spot on the field? No. Wherever he had planted his seed, it would have been the same. Chance did nothing wrong, because every possibility is identical to every other possibility. Not only did chance not do anything wrong — it did not even have the possibility of doing something wrong. This is the most relevant insight for our lives.

After the Big Bang, nothing is as it was before — except for two exceptions:

   Exception 1) The most fundamental law of nature — imperfection — already existed before the Big Bang. It remains in place after the Big Bang. Everything remains imperfect for all eternity. The imperfection before the Big Bang remains the imperfection after the Big Bang.

   Exception 2) The most relevant law of all:
Something is placed within Nothing by chance due to the absence of placement criteria — without any possibility of being placed in the wrong location, because all possibilities are equally valid.Because of this causality before the Big Bang, chance has no possibility of causing anything wrong after the Big Bang eitherChance can do anything — except for one exception: It cannot let anything wrong happen.

   Whatever happens by chance, leave it as it is, for chance cannot make anything wrong, even if it seems wrong at the moment. For chance (randomness) watches over the way in which imperfection remains imperfect.

SOMETHING is, relative to NOTHING (the infinitely many theoretical possibilities), nearly infinitely small. This means: the smaller the uncorrected damage that chance has inflicted on you, the greater the compensation will be. Somehow, somewhere, sometime, chance becomes destiny. The reverse is also true: If chance inflicts a large damage relative to your circumstances, you should correct it, because destiny will compensate that damage only very slightly.
Warning: Trying to outsmart chance, even in the smallest way through self-created “pre-emptive” errors, is ineffective. The executor of imperfection cannot be deceived. Chance collects its flaws randomly — so that everything remains imperfect.

Page 7 of 10 2kugel.com

Religion

Already in antiquity, humans sensed that they were surrounded by an omnipotence. Out of ignorance regarding its cause, they interpreted this omnipotence into various gods and religions. We are born into a world in which religions already exist. Therefore, we believe religion belongs to this world. But that is not the case. Religions are the millennia-long attempt to explain the origin of the world — a futile effort. For everything that exists behaves solely according to the most omnipotent law of nature: imperfection (faulty). Religions are ineffective, because this omnipotence has no religious background, but a physical one.

I alone am the omnipotence:
Imperfection
(the faultiness)

I am the only “God.” Besides me, there is no other god
.(if one insists on using the term “god”)
I am eternal, omnipresent, and omnipotent.

As long as you do not preserve your own faulty as I do,
you are not my image!
As long as you are not my image, I let you die.
I am a merciless god!
If you become my image, you remain alive with me.
I am an eternal god!
As my likeness, I grant you the fruits of our creation.
I am a selfless god!

I require from you only the imperfection caused by chance. I need nothing more. Self-made sacrifices, rituals, and ceremonies are ineffective. They mean nothing to me. I also disregard all worship, glorification, and adoration. I am merely a structure, a system, a principle! No service can be done for me — except for one: Preserving your individual imperfection is the only service you can render to me, for only through that are we ONE.

Good and evil

Everything that exists behaves solely according to the laws of nature. Natural laws contain no “good and evil.” They contain only real or not real. Either they are as they are — or they are not. When one describes a law of nature, the description is either correct or incorrect, but never good or evil. Evil arises when one attempts to correct the most fundamental law of nature — one’s own imperfection (faulty). After futile attempts (for imperfection cannot be corrected),people begin to project their own flaws onto others and then begin to fight those flaws in others. Only then does evil enter the world.

Page 8 of 10

The unmoved Mover

The Principle of Relativity
.
Every uniform, rectilinear motion is relative
and can refer only to a reference point!

(Galileo Galilei)

The Something can refer neither to a beginning nor to an end,
for it has always been here and will always remain here.
The something has no reference point.

One could not actually define any property of SOMETHING,
were it not for the principle of relativity, which states:
A movement can refer only to a reference

Since SOMETHING cannot be referenced to anything, it cannot move
because it could only move relative to a reference point.
Thus we establish one property:
The something is motionless!

On the other hand, the SOMETHING cannot simply be motionless,
for it too could only be motionless relative to a reference point.
Thus we must establish another property:
The something is in motion!

Without a reference point, the SOMETHING is simultaneously both
“in motion” and “motionless.”

The missing reference point = The Unmoved Mover

The question of how the missing reference point came into being does not arise,
for to be missing, one does not need to arise.
One only needs something relative to which one is missing.

The Primordial Magnitude: Since SOMETHING without a reference point cannot have a fixed size

(a specific size can only exist relative to a reference size — for example, a measuring scale),
it is simultaneously both small and large.

The time: The same applies to time. Without a temporal reference point (for example, a clock), it is impossible to assign SOMETHING to a particular time. This means: SOMETHING exists both in every moment and for all eternity, for in timelessness (time without an arrow) the moment is pulse-timed for eternity.

The SOMETHING (all that exists) is present and not present
without a reference point (timed without a time-arrow).
Without a time-arrow, the moment is simultaneously eternity.
Without a reference point, the SOMETHING pulsates from small to large
and back again and thereby creates space.
The pulsation represents kinetic energy (energy that includes mass as a possibility)

The SOMETHING is almost nothing — but not quite nothing. It is nearly infinitely small, yet not zero, and nearly infinitely large. Because it lacks a reference point, it moves relative to itself, periodically (rhythmically), from small to large, for it can rest only relative to itself. We can perceive this in ourselves as our heartbeat. The fluctuating SOMETHING (all that exists) causes our heart to beat.

NOTHING says to SOMETHING: "As my heartbeat, you have always belonged to me"

Page 9 of 10

The Philosophy behind Physics
.
Without something, there would not even be nothing!

    And if one wants to be absolutely precise: Relativity itself is this SOMETHING that fluctuates, for without a reference point the relative is both existent and non-existent (rhythmically). Relative in detail and absolute as the greater whole — but not without exceptions. For the relative creates a flaw in absolute nothingness and therefore cannot escape the principle it causes itself, making it flawed as well. If relativity is, then it is not perfectly present, for an exception is not-there. If relativity is not there, then it is not perfectly absent, for an exception is there. What we call the Big Bang was a random oscillation (an exception) in the vibration of relativity — an asymmetry (a flaw) in symmetry that gives direction to timelessness (rhythm without time-arrow). The beginning of time. From that point on, everything is only approximately as it was before. No moment resembles the previous one anymore.

   Relativity is this purposeless, meaning-free, real SOMETHING that fluctuates; therefore we, too, are only relative to all others. That is why no human resembles another. Everyone differs from all others by at least one exception. No exception resembles another; therefore all humans are perfect only through their individual flaws. All are relative to one another! The question of why relativity is as it is — and not somehow differently — remains unanswered. Imperfection contains no final answer. Can we live without having a final answer?

Long story short:
.
A SOMETHING causes a flaw in the NOTHING. If that weren't the case, there wouldn't even be nothing. Flawedness (imperfection) is therefore the most fundamental of all natural laws. The SOMETHING itself cannot escape the principle it has caused and is therefore also flawed (imperfect). And this imperfect SOMETHING (simultaneously EVERYTHING) has also produced itself as all of us (biological evolution) in order to be able to observe itself, to question itself, to think about itself, to recognize itself, to see itself, and also to feel and understand itself. Therefore, we too are imperfect (faulty) in all our actions, insights, thoughts and feelings. And only in our self-knowledge (knowledge of itself) does the SOMETHING (the EVERYTHING) recognize itself.
.
   Can we live with our flaws? We not only can — we must. For the more we correct our natural imperfections, the more they multiply. Do not let anyone talk you out of your shortcomings. They are system-relevant and make you unique. And in reality, those who criticize your flaws are merely projecting their own imperfections onto you — and fight them in you instead of accepting them as the most fundamental principle within themselves. The snowman from page 4 can additionally testify: If one projects one’s own system-based imperfection (symbolized by the hole in the snowfield) onto others in order to fight it there, the others will rightly defend themselves. And all parties intensify the conflict — sometimes even into war as the final consequence.
.
Final word: Pay attention to chance. It is the executor of imperfection.

Imprint: badhofer Steyr AUSTRIA badhofer.com

admin@badhofer.com Steyr, 08 08 2021 updated: 04.12.2025

Printversion: something-nothing.pdf
.

Page 10 of 10